Contestant on node to joy.
Thank you for your vote and feedback!
you have a very nice design sense. I'm assuming that something it would be more interesting if someone else were logged in at the same time? it seems like a nice proof of concept on it's way to something new and novel but I don't get it yet. sorry | |||
was a little confused by the list of matches and/or opponent finding, but apart from the lobby I love love love the idea! | |||
clever idea, cute execution. doesn't look like you made it that far yet but I'm interested to see where it leads | |||
Thanks. I would like more feedback and request you to ask your friends to take a look at this.
beautiful and novel. didn't seem possible to type spaces. thought of head to head haiku writing is terrifying :) | |||
not terribly sexy, but useful, and impressive for a 2 day project | |||
sounds cool. but links don't seem to work (www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser). let me know if it's working somewhere and I'll update my vote | |||
It looks like Node Knockout thinks our initial redirect to Facebook for auth is what should be our app. Try this URL out instead: http://unexpected-identifie.nko3.jitsu.com
awesome! thanks for sending me the correct link. my only critique is that it's almost too good for what it is :)
seems potentially useful, execution seems fine compared to the other services doing this (especially given the whole 48 hours thing). obviously you're limited by the quality and quantity of recipes. "flour, butter, sugar" yielded "banana cranberry walnut muffins" rather than shortbread cookies. couldn't evaluate whether it was sorting more achievable recipes to the top based on the number of recipes. but it seems like the potential start of something great and I do like it a lot | |||
I'm sorry, I really don't get it. and it's periodically yelling "fail" at me for reasons I can't fathom | |||
No worries! Thanks for checking it out.
All the current games are based on mouse position. Move your mouse where it tells you to.
sometimes I was sure I had followed the instructions and it still told me fail. maybe more feedback on click? also "fiddle"? :) looks like you had fun, I'm sorry I couldn't give you a better score.
nice looking. can't tell if the game's working (but I didn't play drug wars). can't reach some locations, don't know why | |||
great looking chat service. seems to work. well done | |||
404 on the link. love the novelty. the dev art is fine... | |||
fun! I'd probably have feedback on the splash screen (messaging doesn't change once logged in). and a few round completed before I was able to see a board. but in this context even taking away the one star for it seems petty. well done | |||
great looking. moderately useful (would be more useful if it pulled data from continuously running monitoring). it seems to do what you want it to do | |||
Yeah all of the stuff is in place to do that, just need to write out a timer to poll on stuff. One reason i didnt want to do it that way was because its a fixed rate of updating versus POSTing where its as fast as you want to send data
I get an error when I try to login. the splash screen and title make me want it to work so you get stars for that... if it does work, please message me and I'll change my vote. sorry | |||
The domain we set-up was .jit.su, and then it changed to .jitsu.com So we have to re-configure it, and it (FB login) works on both domain now.
editing my vote...
editing my vote...
very cool for 2 days work! would like to see nicer pen strokes, seemed like the pen data was incorrect for a while when we were sharing. but looks like the start of something cool. good job
good looking, but very incomplete. also, couldn't get to lower filters (I saw on the video) on my too small laptop. webgl stuff is neat enough to inspire, but it's sort of like voting on the frosting when there's no cake (awesome frosting though)... sorry. promising | |||
very cool. wish there was more. would probably have not been much fun had no one been playing... but someone was, so awesome... great game. want more (obviously). dev art is adequate | |||
commantool doesn't seem to connect to the test account provided... sorry. monitorpanel seems neat but I don't know enough about databases to evaluate it's utility without a description of what it's doing | |||
very cute. not a ton of functionality, but what do you really need? nice execution | |||
sorry, seems really broken (unmodifiable post-its appear in the middle of the screen). lots of good descriptions on the site though. | |||
Yes, we launched with a critical but we will improve the app. Thanks for your feedback!
good looking but I don't get the big idea by going to the site or reading your descriptions. it's like hot or not but with your friends? | |||
hi thanks for your rating. sorry to have you read the description written by my limited English.. but basically yes, we want people to share their friends and get rated. You'll get credits when friends you share get a 'love' and can then use the credits to request for a profile link of a person you are interested in making friend with.
ah, sounds potentially more interesting than I'd thought. I'll give you another "innovation" star. thanks for the reply! :)
looks good, though I'm not sure what I'm looking at. clicking around a few times seemed to dead-end. the left column was full of markup and the graph isn't labeled | |||
Try keyword 'china'. It was one of the test keywords and for some reason (a bug I guess) it seems to be only one working even though there's really more relations in the database already -- over 13000 objects at the moment.
It's a search engine for news -- with background web crawlers indexing semantically the content of the articles and building relations between them.
it sounds really cool, but the navigation and article display still seem broken to me. regardless, those are "completeness" issues. I won't punish your "utility" or "innovation" because of it :) (editing your score now)
We got permission/verification that we can change our database and we have fixed it now. Other keywords can also be used now. I think it's much more useful now. :-)
very good looking, could use more feedback on my issue (why "complexity"?) | |||
Good feedback, and we agree - #1 item on our roadmap is 'increase depth of analysis and usefulness of feedback.'
ps: 'complexity' issues are usually identifying functions that have a large number of possible branches. For example, deep if-else structures that can become confusing to follow.
higher complexity also leads to better chance for more bugs in your code.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclomatic_complexity
thanks for the clarification, the code it called complex was an if else if... block (maybe 8 cases). it wasn't actual complexity that I could see. really, it was just an example though.
again, very cool
beautiful designs! seems like it's on its way to something very cool